In today’s logistics landscape, the “best” option changes every week. Carrier execution shifts. Congestion moves. Weather cascades. Geopolitics forces reroutes. Utilization swings. In that reality, carrier-provided, aggregate historical emissions factors don’t enable decisions; they’re detached from what actually happens in execution.
What the White Paper Reveals:
Across multiple methodologies and carrier tools, we benchmark a real Shanghai–Rotterdam voyage and compare estimates to actual voyage data.
• Average-based methods missed by up to +416 kg CO₂e per TEU.
• GLEC methodology overestimated emissions by 8.5 kg CO₂e per TEU.
• These variances materially distort carrier/service selection, routing, carbon budgets, and compliance exposure.
From Reporting to Resilience:
To decarbonize logistics, you need execution-grade, high-velocity data and insights that keep pace with operations, so sustainability becomes a daily lever for:
- Carrier and service selection
- Routing and port choices
- Mode shifts and consolidation
- Utilization improvements
- Disruption response (cost, service, CO₂ trade-offs)
Download the white paper to see the complete scenario analysis and what execution-level emissions intelligence enables.
